Various Narrations and Interpretations in Oral History
Compiled by: Mahia Hafizi
Translated by: Fazel Shirzad
2024-10-30
In order to learn more about the problems and challenges of producing oral history works or memoirs, the oral history website has conducted conversations with some experts and activists in this field, which will be presented to the audience in the form of short notes.
In oral history, sometimes the memories of a person are narrated and the topic of discussion is that person; but sometimes, oral history expresses an event or a topic. In this regard, if the focus of oral history is on the "subject", the more narratives we have, the better and more accurate results will be obtained, and the more we will understand the essence of the case.
One of the main differences between oral history and written history is that in oral history, the spirit that governs the event is narrated. In other words, oral history expresses the spirit of the event rather than the body of the event. In oral history, the details of the issue are discussed, and everyone expresses these details from their own perspective. Observing the event from different angles may be due to the way people think about an event.
Some people, because they do not have a correct understanding of this matter, consider the difference of narrations as a defect for oral history. If it is used correctly, it is not only a defect, but it will be a good thing for oral history.
It is a bonus for oral history when the narratives are different but not contradictory. The words of different people about the same event are not necessarily contradictory but different. The beauty of oral history is this difference; but because they do not pay attention to this issue and the work is not done correctly, the good turns into a bad.
In this regard, the correct interpretation of the event is also important. The difference in people's accounts of an event may be due to the time difference in observing that event. The narration of the person who observed the event before its beginning until the end is different from the narration of the person who started observing the event from the middle of the event. The more the oral history researcher asks about the same subject from different people, the better the result will follow. However, if several people talk about a topic, it will be more difficult to compile it, but the result will be more accurate. The editor in oral history is to put together an event narrated from the perspective of different people. It is often said that the basis of oral history is the interview, and we neglect editing; If the wrong editing, it ruins the right interview.
As it was said, the difference between the narrations is different from the contradiction. The contradiction occurs when the narrators of the same event tell two conflicting stories from the same point of view. Here, it is the responsibility of the oral history researcher to determine the correct action and narration with different methods for verifying the narrations. Of course, it should be noted that verification is not always necessary and not always possible!
Number of Visits: 943
The latest
Most visited
The Founder of Hosseiniyeh Ershad
Regarding the presence of [Martyr Ayatollah Motahhari] in Hosseiniyeh Ershad, it would be inaccurate to refer to it just as “participation”; he was, in fact, one of its founders. At a time when Tehran lacked proper, organized, and intellectually rigorous religious gatherings, a few individuals decided to initiate such a movement—and the central ...The Role of the Bazaaris in the Final Days of the Islamic Revolution
I was at home in Shahin Villa, Karaj, on Friday, 17th of Shahrivar (September 8th, 1978), when I heard about martial law on the radio at noon. I immediately came to Tehran. The city was completely deserted and under the control of armed soldiers, and it was impossible to enter Jaleh Street and the surrounding area of the square. The news indicated that people had gathered in Jaleh Square and that the soldiers had ...How to send Imam's announcements to Iran
In the first part, the issue of funds, Hajj Sheikh Nasrallah Khalkhali - who represented most of the religious authorities - was also the representative of Imam. In Najaf, there was a money exchange office that cooperated with the money exchange offices in Tehran. Some of the funds were exchanged through him.Operation Beit al-Moqaddas and Liberation of Khorramshahr
After Operation Fat’h al-Mobin, we traveled to Kermanshah and visited Sar-e-Pol-e-Zahab before heading to Ilam. During Operation Beit al-Moqaddas, the 27th Brigade was still receiving support from the West. We maintained contact with individuals who had previously worked in Area 7 and were now leading the brigade. It was through these connections that I learned about Operation Beit al-Moqaddas.
