A Spring Redolent of Gunpowder in the Days of the Referendum

Selected by Mahya Hafezy
Translated by Kianoush Borzouei

2026-4-8


That year I could not be with my family for Nowruz. I was not overly distressed by this—firstly because I was an army man fulfilling official duties, and secondly because I was not alone in separation; my comrades were likewise apart from their families. We endured cold, dispirited days during the Nowruz of 1358 (1979). The sole abiding recollection is that we marked the new year at the Mahabad barracks with thoughts of our families.

A few days into March of 1979, the battalion command announced that a referendum would be conducted—a vote to affirm or repudiate the nascent Islamic Republic. For the balloting a helicopter was dispatched to land in the middle of the barracks’ parade ground. Personnel went in groups and cast their ballots. The polling officials, fearing a possible counter‑revolutionary attack, hurried the process in order to depart swiftly by helicopter.

Two types of ballots had been provided: one inscribed “Islamic Republic—Yes” and the other “No.” The forces stationed at the barracks deposited the “Islamic Republic—Yes” ballots into the box; I learned this from the men in the mess hall. Voting concluded in under an hour, and the helicopter departed.

That very night, heavy gunfire erupted from within the city, signaling armed engagement. The clash resulted in the death of a police officer whose body was abandoned beside the barracks; the assailants fled, and from the following day police personnel were no longer visible within the city. By night, the town and its intersections were effectively controlled by elements of Qasemlu’s Democratic Party, garbed in what was described as Kurdish attire.[1]

 


[1] Source: cherik-e-Pir (The Old Guerrilla), Memoirs of Kioumars Jahan‑Ara, ed. Seyyed Vali Hashemi, Tehran: Sureh‑Mehr Publishing, 1st ed., 2018, p. 34.



 
Number of Visits: 172


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
Captcha (6 + 7) :
 

Validation: Challenges and Necessities

Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.
A Portion of Abbas Douzduzani’s Memoirs

From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government

In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...

Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity

The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.
Experts Answer to Oral History Questions

100 Questions/27

What is the place of research ethics in compiling oral history?
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.