Oral History Workshop – 8
Rules of an interview
Shahed Yazdan
Translated by M. B. Khoshnevisan
2023-1-24
The oral history website is going to provide the educational materials of some oral history workshops to the audience in written form. The present series has been prepared using the materials of one of these workshops. As you will see, many of the provided contents are not original or less said contents, but we have tried to provide categorized contents so that they can be used more.
***
During the interview
The interviewer needs to observe the social rues during the interview. In this section, some of these rules are described.
Rules of an interview
● If the duration of each interview session is between 60 and 90 minutes, it is a good option and will give the best result.
● The place of the interview should be a place where the interviewee chooses and he or she feels more comfortable.
● The interviewer's body language is of great importance; Where to show states such as confirmation, surprise, etc. to the interviewee with different body postures or speak with hand gestures. There is no single version for this issue; the interviewer must determine the best way to use body language during the interview according to the culture, location, etc.
● The interval between two sessions depends on the researcher's discretion and does not include any rules, but some experts suggest that one interview session should be held every week.
● The meeting should have a "good start"; The interviewer should find this good start according to the mood of the interviewee.
● Before conducting an interview, the interviewer needs to review and remember the questions he or she has prepared for each meeting repeatedly; also, he or she should be prepared to ask the questions that may arise during the interview. Questions should not be asked in full in the interview session. Only the interviewer can write down some words in the notebook so that he or she does not forget.
● How the interviewer sits is also very important. Creating a balance between sitting too formally or too comfortably, as well as the position and angle of the interviewer in relation to the interviewee are things like this.
● Gaining the narrator's trust by the interviewer is very important. If the interviewee is sure about what he or she says or what he or she sees in the interview place, the interviewer is a trustworthy person.
● In some countries, to do an oral history work, a written legal contract is drawn up, and the interview starts after signing this contract. In this contract, things like identifying the owner of the work, permission to use and publish, violation of laws, etc. are seen.
● Every interview must have an identity certificate. For this purpose, at the beginning and end of the meeting, the interviewer speaks in one or two sentences about the name of the interviewee, the interview date, the location of the meeting, the number of meetings and its topic.
Number of Visits: 3487
The latest
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 17
- Oral History News of December-January 2026
- Analyzing the Impact of Sacred Defense Memories on the New Generation: Usage in Transmitting Values
- The Sha‘baniyya Uprising as Narrated by Ali Tahiri
- 100 Questions/16
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
- 100 Questions/15
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
Most visited
- Comparison of Official (Institutional) Oral History with Unofficial (Popular/Personal) Oral History
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 15
- The Three Hundred and Seventy-Third Night of Remembrance – Part One
- 100 Questions/15
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 16
- The Sha‘baniyya Uprising as Narrated by Ali Tahiri
- 100 Questions/16
- Analyzing the Impact of Sacred Defense Memories on the New Generation: Usage in Transmitting Values
Oral History of 40 Years
One of the main hypotheses regarding the reason for the growth and expansion of oral history in the modern era relates to the fact that oral history is the best tool for addressing lesser-known topics of contemporary history. Topics that, particularly because little information is available about them, have received less attention.Omissions in the Editing of Oral History
After the completion of interview sessions, the original recordings are archived, the interviews are transcribed, proofread, and re-listened to. If the material possesses the qualities required for publication in the form of an article or a book, the editing process must begin. In general, understanding a verbatim transcription of an interview is often not straightforward and requires editing so that it may be transformed into a fluent, well-documented text that is easy to comprehend.100 Questions/8
We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week. The goal of this project is to open new doors to an issue and promote scientific discussions in the field of oral history.The Role of Objects in Oral Narrative
Philosophers refer to anything that exists—or possesses the potential to exist—as an object. This concept may manifest in material forms, abstract notions, and even human emotions and lived experiences. In other words, an object encompasses a vast spectrum of beings and phenomena, each endowed with particular attributes and characteristics, and apprehensible in diverse modalities.