The Imposed War Oral History
New Horizons or Multiple Narratives?
Mohammad Doroodian
Translated by: Mohammad Karimi
2015-10-18
The expanding trend in using Oral History, bring about this question: What kind of goals and conclusions does Oral History observe? This question is based on two presumptions: First, using Oral History is followed for completing written history with a cultural-social approach. Moreover, the outcome of imposed war oral history would develop people’s defense approach toward war based on cultural-ideological teachings, and also multiple narratives of war events by the cooperation of all the people who have experienced war.
My goal for presenting this question and its survey is to clarify the pathology of imposed war Oral History and the “necessity” of revising it. As it is clear, the Imposed War Oral History, despite being methodologically “Oral”, however, its approach remains “historical”. With only a clear difference that in Oral History the individual’s relation with the event is narrative. So, political and social factors, individual-organizational motives of narrating an event, just like written historiography, play a very important role. By changing the conditions, the orientation and the subjects of the Imposed War Oral History, just like written historiography will change.
By this explanation and by assuming historical approach toward war, despite having the possibility of recognizing the details of political-military events of war, in time and place, does not have the capability of recognizing the “war problem”, conceptually and methodologically speaking, Oral History has the same vulnerabilities that written historiography has. Moreover, and despite the assumed original aims for Oral History, the resent methods in Oral History for completing written historiography will end in multiple narratives and it will gradually make it difficult to have a historical clarification by using a narrative that is comprehensive and accepted by all.
In written historiography, comparing other subjects, we focus on “events” considering the deeds of Army and Revolutionary Guards during the war, along with some other explanations. Oral History in its best form will present and explain the relation between the individual and the event. Actually, this matter will result in multiple narratives and completing the written history. This consideration is under the effect of Oral History characteristics, and also political –social conditions and individual-organization motives in narrating war.
Despite the original assumed goals for Oral History and considering the possible outcomes, is this outcome an expected and wanted one? Or there should be a revision in present aims and methods of the Imposed War Oral History?
In fact, “individualism” of the Imposed War Oral History, beside “military institutionalism” for reinforcing organizational identity, with the focus on “events” instead of strategic analysis, none would complete each other. However, by creating multiple narratives, understanding war events and subject will become more and more difficult for the war and after-war generations than ever.
Now; assuming the correctness of this pathology of the Imposed War Oral History, what should be done?
October 3rd, 2015
Number of Visits: 5646
The latest
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 7
- From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 29
- 100 Questions/28
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 6
- Memories of Farshid Eskandari
- Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 28
Most visited
- An Interview with Members of an Iraqi Mawkib Present at the Gatherings in Tehran
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 5
- Memoirs of Manizheh Lashkari
- The 373rd Night of Memories – Part 6
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 28
- Memories of Farshid Eskandari
- Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
- 100 Questions/28
The Beating Pulse of a Nation at the Moment of Nowruz
Every year, in the days and nights leading up to Nowruz, Shohada Square had a special charm. A few days before the New Year, the shops would fill with customers, and street vendors would take over the sidewalks. You could find everything in their stalls (from items for the Haft Sin table, candles, goldfish, and spring flowers to clothes, bags, and shoes).The Editor's Missing Place on the “Deck”
The book From Deck to Heaven offers a relatively fresh approach to examining the role of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army Navy (AJA) during the eight years of the Sacred Defense, published under the “Oral History of the Islamic Revolution” series. To compile this book, the esteemed author has utilized documentary research (referring to relevant archival centers and selecting documents) and field research ...An Exceptional Haft‑Seen Table
I wanted to celebrate the new year with my family. Together with two relief workers I boarded buses designated for transporting the wounded to Choubideh and received our mission orders. We waited for a helicopter to take us to Bandar Imam Khomeini. I was stationed near the helicopter’s touchdown zone and was slight in build. As the helicopter was about to land, I could not steady myself; the breeze generated by the rotor blades lifted me off the ground.Spring under the shadow of war
Composing the Spring special for the new year in the past years was mostly along with hope, nature’s rebirth and the promise of renewal of life. Spring has always been a reminder for returning of life and peace after the Winters’ cold. This year though, another atmosphere has settled over our land in the last days of Esfand (March).
