Leader’s memory of his philosophy professor



14 April 2015

Ayatollah Sheikh Mujtaba Qazvini was the philosophy professor of the Supreme Leader of Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei and a lecturer and great scholar in Mashhad during 1330s and 1340s (1950s and 1960s). Ayatollah Qazvini was among the first persons who went to the city of Qom and pledged allegiance with Imam Khomeini (God’s mercy upon him) with the beginning of the movement against the Pahlavi regime; an allegiance which lasted until his death in 1346 SH (1967).
In a meeting with the professors, scholars, missionaries and researchers of Iran’s seminaries, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution said about him, “The late Sheikh Mujtaba not only recognized the Imam but promoted his way until he was alive.”
On the occasion of the anniversary of the passing away of this great scholar, the information center khamenei.ir has published a memory of the leader in praising this scholar.
Sheikh Mujtaba was a great man. He was both a clergyman and had a strong personality among those clergymen with whom I associated – as I have already said many times. It was very strange. Two or three years after returning from Qom, I had the opportunity to associate with him closely until his death in 1967. I felt his existence very deeply. He was an extraordinary man. His personality subdued everyone. Everybody who knew him in Mashhad respected him. I had witnessed his joint meetings with the scholars of Mashhad.When he said something, everybody accepted it whether or not; he was like this. This Mr. Amirza Javad and others treated with him as disciples; the treatment of follower and disciple. Hajj Sheikh Mujtaba was an extraordinary man … he was skilled in everything. He had studied philosophy. Not that he had only studied something – for example suppose – before Agha Mirza Mahdi Esfahani, no. Mr. Ashtiani said when Agha Mirza Mahdi had returned from Najaf, he had stayed with Agha Mirza Ahmad Ashtiani for several months. This was quoted by Agha Jalal Ashtiani. But I don’t know to what extent it is true. However, he had no record of studying philosophy. But Hajj Sheikh Mujtaba did. He was skilled in foreign sciences and such things. He knew everything.

Translated By: Mohammad Bagher Khoshnevisan



 
Number of Visits: 1650


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
 

Introducing the Best Oral History Books of Sacred Defense

According to Iranian Oral History Website, the introduction of best books of active provinces in the field of oral history of sacred defense is based on the review of 100 books published by general offices for the Protection of Works and Publishing of Sacred Defense Values and Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guards (Sepah) throughout country, during years 2017 and 2018.

This Lady Called the "Captive", "Freedman"

As reported by Oral History Website of Iran Behjat Afraz died on January 12, 2019. According to notification provided by the organization in which he worked, "The late was invited by Dr. Seifollah Vahid Dastjerdi, the current head of Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran, to work as the officer in charge of the bureau for captives and missing of the imposed war. She worked from the beginning of ...
Two hundred and ninety-eighth night of reminiscences

Shrine Defenders like Sacred Defense Warriors

According to Iranian oral history website, Two hundred and ninety eighth night of reminiscences of sacred defense was held at Art Center Andisheh Hall on Thursday, December 27th 2019. Masoud Nouri, Abbas Boostani, Hassan Arabi and Mohsen Safai spoke about their memories of shrine and sacred defense defenders.
Biannual Journal of Oral History

We Have Not Yet Approached a Common Expression in Oral History Practice

Gholamreza Azizi, director of NLAI Research Institute, talked to the Iranian Oral History Website correspondent about some weaknesses that oral history field faces, "books which are published in field of oral history show that we have not still reached a common language in oral history practice and there has not been still a common understanding. The reason for this is that oral history has not yet been accepted as a scientific discipline in universities.