Oral History Interview & Importance – Part 23

Arguments with the Narrator

Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian

2017-9-26


One thing that the interviewer shall seriously avoid is long discussions and argument with the narrator. In some cases the narrator insists on the credibility of their information and perceptions and the interviewer has a different idea based on their sources of information. In such cases, both sides might insist on their position and interrupt the interview.

The following has to be stated:

  1. The main task of the interviewer is to jog the mind of the narrator to help them remember old memories and incidents they have witnessed; however such efforts shall not be imperious and controlling. Unfortunately we see interviewers that due to their knowledge and long experience have a top to bottom look and in case of any mistakes by the narrator brag about their information and humiliate the narrator to prove their perceptions.
  2. Mistakes in recounting the memories is an inevitable element in the oral history interviewer and requires patience. Nevertheless, time and number of incidents weaken the memory and information gets mixed up and result in faults by the narrator while recounting them and they might not acknowledge their mistake. Under such circumstances, the interviewer shall respectfully and with no long arguments point out the mistake and in case the narrator refuses to accept, the interviewer shall stop the argument and wait for an opportunity to provide enough evidence to prove his argument. In case it doesn’t work, a full description shall be provided as footnote by the narrator while publishing the article.

I remember that while interviewing a prominent social and cultural feature, he made a mistake. I pointed it out to be corrected but he didn’t accept it. Hence, I didn’t argue and in our next sessions tried to provide evidence and literature to prove it. Despite all the evidence he insisted on his position. In such cases there is nothing but patience and flexibility and definitions and elaborations shall be offered as annexes to the publications.

 

  1. Sometimes the narrator requires the interviewer to express their opinion on the subject matter or their idea of the memories recounted. Such cases are not an opportunity for arguments and challenges. Our opinion might differ but there is no need to start a long discussion and argument.
  2. The biggest mistake is to boast others’ opinion and create fronts in between. Such behaviors cripple the narrator’s self-confidence and in some cases it might be associated with a bad reaction by the narrator. Of course in a targeted interview, while asking questions, it is possible to make reference to other narrations but it shall not be in the form of arguments and quarrel.

 

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 1 - Oral History, Path to Cultural Dialogue

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 2 - Characteristics of an Interviewer

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 3 - Selecting a Subject

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 4 - Narrator Identification & Selection

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 5 - Goal Setting

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 6 - Importance of Pre-interview Data Collection

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 7 - To Schedule & Coordinate an Interview

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 8 - Required Equipment & Accessories

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 9 - Presentation is vital

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 10 - Interview Room

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 11 - Pre-interview Justifications

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 12 - How to Start an Interview

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 13 - Proper Query

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 14 - Sample Query

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 15 - How to ask questions?

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 16 - Body Languag

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 17 - Application of Body Language (1)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 18 - Application of Body Language (2)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 19 - Listening Carefully (1)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 20 - Listening Carefully (2)

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 21- New Questions

Oral History Interview & Importance Part 22 - Duration



 
Number of Visits: 4478


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
 
Part of memoirs of Seyed Hadi Khamenei

The Arab People Committee

Another event that happened in Khuzestan Province and I followed up was the Arab People Committee. One day, we were informed that the Arabs had set up a committee special for themselves. At that time, I had less information about the Arab People , but knew well that dividing the people into Arab and non-Arab was a harmful measure.
Book Review

Kak-e Khak

The book “Kak-e Khak” is the narration of Mohammad Reza Ahmadi (Haj Habib), a commander in Kurdistan fronts. It has been published by Sarv-e Sorkh Publications in 500 copies in spring of 1400 (2022) and in 574 pages. Fatemeh Ghanbari has edited the book and the interview was conducted with the cooperation of Hossein Zahmatkesh.

Is oral history the words of people who have not been seen?

Some are of the view that oral history is useful because it is the words of people who have not been seen. It is meant by people who have not been seen, those who have not had any title or position. If we look at oral history from this point of view, it will be objected why the oral memories of famous people such as revolutionary leaders or war commanders are compiled.

Daily Notes of a Mother

Memories of Ashraf-al Sadat Sistani
They bring Javad's body in front of the house. His mother comes forward and says to lay him down and recite Ziarat Warith. His uncle recites Ziarat and then tells take him to the mosque which is in the middle of the street and pray the funeral prayer (Ṣalāt al-Janāzah) so that those who do not know what the funeral prayer is to learn it.