Preventing Distractibility in Oral History Interview
Hamid Ghazvini
Translated by Ruhollah Golmoradi
2022-11-15
One problem that oral history researchers face is distractibility and not enough fixation by the interviewee. This situation that is sometimes accompanied with not-related issues not only undermine the narrative but also damage the narrator’s status for the interviewer and those who use the interview. Which measures should be on the agenda to resolve the problem or lessen its harms?
To achieve this one should have a clear image of causes of distractibility.
In addition to physical failures, distractibility or what is called not enough attention may be result of numerous and various activities of the narrator and his/her extensive preoccupations, lack of enough sleeping and being bored, stress, depression, feeling of defeat, worried about consequences of the interview, mental stimuli in the interview environment, and incorrect behavior of the interviewer.
Resolutions for Increasing Fixation and Preventing Distractibility during Oral History Interview
- Before starting the interview, the narrator should be ensured his/her memories cause no problem for anyone and it would not be published without his permission.
- From the first interviews and during the interview, the interviewer should behave in a way not sensitize the narrator and make him/her worried.
- Before starting the interview, we should be sure about physical preparation of the narrator for the interview and that he/she is not tired.
- Environmental factors that decrease the narrator fixation should be removed as soon as possible from the interview place or make them inaccessible such as mobile phone, TV, Clock Tick Tock, ambient noise, people who commute, etc.
- The narrator should be reminded of that his/her more fixation contributes to generate a socially worthwhile work and promoting it.
- If the distractibility is intense, the interviewee, consulted by the expert, could be represented by experiences related with enhancing fixation.
- We should ask the interviewee that think of two or three chief tasks which one of them is the very interview.
- The narrator should be asked to do the most preferred tasks before the interview so that he/she would be more relaxed during the interview.
- Sometimes people mistake distractibility for Alzheimer and place themselves in an improper situation; such people should be reminded of that distractibility is a temporary disorder and may be caused by internal and external factors and stimuli, but Alzheimer is result of disease of the reason deterioration and not emerge in all the people.
- The narrator should be asked to write in advance the titles related to his/her memories and brought them with him/herself.
- To avoid ask several questions simultaneously so that the narrator to answer the questions with more fixation.
- To avoid starting the interview with difficult and sensitizing questions that decrease the narrator’s fixation.
- Questions should be as soon as possible the simple ad not complicated ones.
- Some medicines may lessen fixation due to some side effects; so, we should notice not to held the interview after taking such medicines.
Number of Visits: 2379








The latest
Most visited
- Design and Structure of Interview Questions in Oral History: Principles and Methods
- A Reflection on the Relationship between Individual Memory and Oral History
- Oral history news for March-April 2025
- The Embankment Wounded Shoulders – 5
- Morteza Tavakoli Narrates Student Activities
- Sir Saeed
- First Encounter with the Mojahedin-e Khalq
- The 367th "Night of Memory"
A Review of the Book “Brothers of the Castle of the Forgetful”: Memoirs of Taher Asadollahi
"In the morning, a white-haired, thin captain who looked to be twenty-five or six years old came after counting and having breakfast, walked in front of everyone, holding his waist, and said, "From tomorrow on, when you sit down and get up, you will say, 'Death to Khomeini,' otherwise I will bring disaster upon you, so that you will wish for death."Tabas Fog
Ebham-e Tabas: Ramzgoshayi az ja’beh siah-e tahajom nezami Amrika (Tabas Fog: Decoding the Black Box of the U.S. Military Invasion) is the title of a recently published book by Shadab Asgari. After the Islamic Revolution, on November 4, 1979, students seized the US embassy in Tehran and a number of US diplomats were imprisoned. The US army carried out “Tabas Operation” or “Eagle’s Claw” in Iran on April 24, 1980, ostensibly to free these diplomats, but it failed.An Excerpt from the Memoirs of General Mohammad Jafar Asadi
As Operation Fath-ol-Mobin came to an end, the commanders gathered at the “Montazeran-e Shahadat” Base, thrilled by a huge and, to some extent, astonishing victory achieved in such a short time. They were already bracing themselves for the next battle. It is no exaggeration to say that this operation solidified an unprecedented friendship between the Army and IRGC commanders.A Selection from the Memoirs of Haj Hossein Yekta
The scorching cold breeze of the midnight made its way under my wet clothes and I shivered. The artillery fire did not stop. Ali Donyadideh and Hassan Moghimi were in front. The rest were behind us. So ruthlessly that it was as if we were on our own soil. Before we had even settled in at the three-way intersection of the Faw-Basra-Umm al-Qasr road, an Iraqi jeep appeared in front of us.
