Qualitizing Oral History Works-1
Mahya Hafezi
Translated by Ruhollah Golmoradi
2023-9-21
The Iranian Oral History Website has conducted short conversations with some experts and practitioners on the topic of how to improve oral history books or memoirs, the results of which will be presented to the readers in the form of short notes and in several parts.
■ Linking photo and appendix documents to the book text
The selection of photos and documents at the end should be related to the contents of the book. To improve quality of the work, it is suggested to link these photos and documents to the text. It is better to include the page number of the text in the caption of the photo and document; put also number of the document or related photo in parentheses in the main body so that the audience can easily access it.
■ Detailed descriptions for photos and documents
Captions are necessary for photos and documents in the book; but the more accurate this caption, the higher quality of the work will be. In addition to linking the photo and document to the text, and providing the identity information of the photo and document, there are subtler points that should be considered. Observing these points will increase the audience's research connection with the book.
■ Typesetting the document text
The text of some documents is illegible and will cause the researcher to use them less. Typesetting the text will increase quality of the work.
■ Indexing and commentary
In order to attract researchers more to the oral history book, it is necessary to carefully index the book. The more the content index of the book, the higher its research rank will be. In the index, names of people and places are always present; But you can add other lists to it according to content of the book. For example, for an oral history book on the topic of Holy Defense, indexes of operations, terms, weapons, names of martyrs, etc. can also be prepared.
To be continued...
Number of Visits: 3374
The latest
- 100 Questions/47
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 47
- Servants Narration of the Religious Rituals of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (AS) From Tradition to Lived Experience
- Memories of Nasrollah Fat’hian
- Memories of Hossein Ali Najafian
- 100 Questions/46
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 46
- Theory Six: The Inevitability of Perspective
Most visited
- 100 Questions/ 45
- Theory Six: The Inevitability of Perspective
- Memoirs of Behzad Rastegari
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War - 46
- 100 Questions/46
- Memories of Hossein Ali Najafian
- Servants Narration of the Religious Rituals of the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza (AS) From Tradition to Lived Experience
- Memories of Nasrollah Fat’hian
100 Questions / 43
How can narrators and interviewers reach a common understanding?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Documentary Pathology of the US Embassy Documents
The Necessity of Scientific Rereading and Content Analysis of DocumentsMore than four decades have passed since the publication of the first collections of documents from the US Embassy in Tehran. However, despite the relatively easy access to this treasure trove of documents, systematic research exploitation of it has not been adequate. We still do not have a “comprehensive picture” of the content of these 11,000 documents.
100 Questions / 42
What is the importance of the narrator and interviewers shared understanding of the past in oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all the answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.