Part of memoirs of martyr Seyed Asadollah Lajevardi

Boycotting within prison

Selected by: Faezeh Sassanikhah
Translated by: M.B. Khoshnevisan

2025-3-17


Here I remember something that breaks the continuity, and I have to say it because I may forget it later. In Evin Prison, due to the special position that we and our brothers held and our belief in following the line of Marja’eiyat [sources of emulation] and the Imam, we had many differences with the Mujahedin.[1] On all issues, from ideological matters to minor details, and even on tactical matters, we had significant disagreements. They considered many actions permissible to achieve their goals that were completely forbidden from our perspective and in Islam.

 

We had a strong and unwavering stance, especially against Marxism. In our view, Marxists were also bound to the fate of Marxism. We, who rejected both Marxism and Marxists, were boycotted by the Mujahedin. In prison, we were completely isolated; they neither spoke to us nor allowed others under their influence to communicate with us. They feared that contact with us would influence their thoughts negatively and cloud their revolutionary vision. Thus, they actively avoided any interaction with us. This boycott prevented anyone from approaching us, as they were afraid of the consequences. If someone dared to contact us, they would face severe punishment. They were instructed to clarify their position - either be with us and avoid contact with them, or vice versa.

 

This situation was designed to keep the newcomers in prison under their control. If they had the chance to contact us directly, they might have sought our opinions on certain matters to resolve conflicts or prevent any revelations outside the prison. They were always looking for an opportunity to engage with us.[2]

 


[1] Habibollah Asgarowladi: The three of us, Mr. Lajevardi, Mr. Haj Heidari, and I, decided to invite 12 leaders of the MKO who were in Mashhad Prison and present an ultimatum to them. Martyr Lajevardi believed that engaging in further arguments was unnecessary, as he knew these individuals were closed-minded and resistant to others' perspectives. Over 20 nights, we had discussions with about 10-12 of their leaders. These meetings were the final arguments with some of the leaders of the People’s Mujahedin. When they were supposed to respond, they delayed until the next morning. Mr. Lajevardi was convinced that their response was evident. The following morning, they labeled us as the number one counter-revolutionaries. Martyr Lajevardi mentioned that it was clear to him they would not change, despite our efforts. (Shahed Yaran, Martyr Seyyed Asadollah Lajevardi, p. 6)

 

[2] Source: Eslami, Javad, The Struggle Based on the Narration of Martyr Seyyed Asadollah Lajevardi, Iranian Press Cultural Institute, Iran Publications, 1401 (2022), Tehran, p. 157.

 



 
Number of Visits: 1311


Comments

 
Full Name:
Email:
Comment:
 

Comparing the Narratives of Commanders and Ordinary Combatants in the Sacred Defense

An Analysis of Functions and Consequences
The experience of the Sacred Defense cannot be comprehended merely through statistics or official reports; what truly endures from war are the narratives of those who stood upon its frontlines. These narratives, however, vary significantly depending on one’s position, responsibilities, and lived experience.

Unveiling of the book "Oral History: What and Why"

The First report: Alireza Kamari
According to the Oral History website, the unveiling ceremony of the book "Oral History: What and Why" by Hamid Qazvini was held on Sunday evening, November 24, 1404, in the presence of experts in the field of oral history in the Salman Farsi Hall of the Arts Center.

Mohammad — The Messiah of Kurdistan

Boroujerdi immediately said to Darvish, “Ready a few men; we’re going.” Then he moved toward Mostafa, who was studying the Kurdistan map. Mostafa straightened his back and said, “During my service in the army I experienced a full-scale war in Kurdistan. Guerrilla warfare in Kurdistan follows its own rules. The anti-revolutionary commanders want to draw us into a battle chosen on their terms.”