The Beating Pulse of a Nation at the Moment of Nowruz
Compiled by Faezeh Sassanikhah
Translated by Fazel Shirzad
2026-4-14
Every year, in the days and nights leading up to Nowruz, Shohada Square had a special charm. A few days before the New Year, the shops would fill with customers, and street vendors would take over the sidewalks. You could find everything in their stalls (from items for the Haft‑Sin table, candles, goldfish, and spring flowers to clothes, bags, and shoes).
But this year, because of the martyrdom of the Leader, the many compatriots we lost, and the wartime conditions, people didn’t welcome the New Year as they used to, and the square lacked its usual festive atmosphere. Instead, it carried the feeling of mourning and a strong, collective presence.
On the last day of Esfand (March), just a few hours before the new year, some people brought their Haft‑Sin tables (decorated with the national flag and photos of the martyred Leader and the new Leader) to the square so they could spend the moment of the year’s turning there. It was a scene Shohada Square had never witnessed before. They had come so the streets would belong to the patriots, not to those who betrayed the homeland. A few hours later, on the first night of the New Year, families, individuals, and groups gathered there again, just as they had the previous nights. And they kept coming (on cold nights, in mild weather, under light rain, and during the spring’s fierce thunderstorms).

This steadfastness has taken such deep root in the streets that I know if, years from now, someone asks me:
“How is it possible that Nowruz arrived and Iranians didn’t think about buying new-year goods? How could it be that no one bought sabzeh or goldfish? How could people spend New Year’s Eve in the streets instead of visiting relatives? How could they avoid traveling just to make their presence in the capital more visible? How could they bring their Haft‑Sin tables into the streets?”
I will proudly say:
“Yes! We did all of that. In those days, our homes had grown as wide as our hearts. The size of every home had stretched to include all the streets and squares of the city. We gathered there; we chanted; we formed car convoys; we broke our fast together; we held up the Qur’an over our heads on Laylat al‑Qadr; and we welcomed the New Year.”
And I will add with excitement:
“Just a few hours before Nowruz, the weather was cloudy and rainy. People greeted the New Year under the rain and bid farewell to the month of Ramadan. And ten minutes before the New Year, Israel attacked the capital, hoping to ruin our most precious moments.”
And if they ask, “Weren’t you afraid?” I’ll say:
“To be honest, yes (but we didn’t leave). From the bottom of our hearts, we prayed for its destruction.”

Now our ancient holiday has ended, and I already miss Nowruz 1405 and all those nights after the start of the Ramadan war. I miss the streets and squares that, every night of the holiday, filled with people who came together to protect their country and their system so that the military forces could focus solely on the foreign enemy.
I miss the chance encounters with relatives, friends, and neighbors; the raised fists and cries of ‘Allahu Akbar’ when American warplanes appeared over the city; the balloon sellers; the children in the crowd; the volunteer stands at the edges of the square; the tea served at the end of the gatherings; the women who looked different from me; and the rainy nights when colorful umbrellas opened one by one.
My heart beats for the steady hearts of those days and nights—moments when, in the streets, miracles were born at every turn, carried by those whose presence filled every town and village with its unmistakable scent.

Watching this diversity of people standing together reminds me of the wistful stories elders tell of the unity of the 1980s. But I believe today’s epic is even greater. Back then, society was more uniform; but today, nearly five decades later, with all these differences in beliefs and with media working day and night to divide us, we still stand shoulder to shoulder.
These nights (especially the unique Nowruz nights) showed us that when the homeland is in danger, streets and squares are no longer mere places of passage; they become the beating pulse of a nation.

Number of Visits: 481
The latest
- The Story of the First Sacred Defense Book Award
- Oral History and Social Resilience in Hard Times
- 100 Questions/ 34
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
- A Review of Scientific and Operational Strategies for Overcoming the Erosion of Narrators’ Memory
- 100 Questions/ 33
- Expert Panel Session on Oral History of the Country – (Part 2)
- Memoirs of Ahmad Nabavi
Most visited
- Oral History News/April–May 2026
- Memoirs of Majid Yousefzadeh
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 33
- Expert Panel Session on Oral History of the Country – (Part 2)
- 100 Questions/ 33
- Memoirs of Ahmad Nabavi
- A Review of Scientific and Operational Strategies for Overcoming the Erosion of Narrators’ Memory
- Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor – 34
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.100 Questions/27
What is the place of research ethics in compiling oral history?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
