Theories about oral history narrated by artificial intelligence
Theory Four: The Crisis of Border Legitimacy
Machine Translation edited by Mandana Karimi
2026-7-23
Oral history, more than being an accumulation of narratives, is a field of methodical dialogue between memory, power, ethics, and representation. In the meantime, one of the challenges for researchers in this field is to move from “interview report” to “theoretical structure”; a question to which each expert, based on his or her experience and intellectual framework, gives a different answer.
If we provide the answers of 7 oral history experts - who have answered a specific question on the oral history website - to artificial intelligence, what patterns and repetitions will be obtained? Is artificial intelligence simply reflecting the consensus of opinions or will it arrive at a theory from the plurality of answers?
To find the result, we analyzed the experts’ answers with the help of DeepSeek artificial intelligence and came up with some theories. From now on, the theories extracted by AI based on the experts' responses will be presented in order to open a new chapter in theorizing on the topic of oral history.
■■■
Theory Four: The Crisis of Border Legitimacy
Theoretical sentence:
While traditional historiography has focused on elites, official documents, and dry language, and has excluded non-elite groups, silent voices, and general audiences; oral history has been able to create public acceptance not because of higher scientific accuracy, but because of its "inherent plurality" at three levels - the diversity of narrators (from the lower classes to women and tribes), the diversity of narratives (polyphony instead of monophony), and the diversity of format (living and flowing language instead of dry text); hence, public acceptance is not a testament to epistemic superiority, but a sign of "a response to the needs of those deprived of official history. “Theoretical Background:
This theory is based on the responses of 7 oral history experts (Gholamreza Azari Khakster, Mohammad Mehdi Behdarvand, Hassan Beheshtipour, Mohammad Mehdi Abdollahzadeh, Seyyed Mohammad Sadeq Feyz, Hamid Qazvini, and Mohammad Mohsen Mos’hafi) to the question, “What is the reason for the general interest in oral history?” The repetition of concepts such as “the human and living face of history”, “the voice of the inferior and invisible classes against the official narrative”, “the attractiveness of fluent language and simple text against dry official texts”, “participation and agency of different strata in writing history”, “multiplicity of narratives and diversity of format”, “breaking the monopoly of power in traditional historiography”, “identification of the audience with the narrators’ direct narratives”, and “response to the needs of those deprived of official history” in these responses has led artificial intelligence to the model you have studied.
To view the experts’ initial responses to this question, click here.
Number of Visits: 4
The latest
- Theory Four: The Crisis of Border Legitimacy
- A Look at the Book of the Restless Anonymous
- 100 Questions / 39
- A Classmates Narration of Martyr Zahra Haddad Adel
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War-39
- Explaining the “Use of Oral History in Writing Entries”
- 100 Questions / 38
- Examining the Differences in the Oral History Method of the Revolution and the War
Most visited
- Report of the 15th Oral History Conference; Religion and Culture -3
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War Doctor-38
- Oral History News of May 22nd to June 21st 2026
- 100 Questions / 38
- Examining the Differences in the Oral History Method of the Revolution and the War
- Explaining the “Use of Oral History in Writing Entries”
- A Classmates Narration of Martyr Zahra Haddad Adel
- The Third Regiment: Memoirs of an Iraqi Prisoner of War-39
100 Questions/ 34
To what extent are we allowed to use narrative techniques (however simple) in compiling an oral history text?We asked several researchers and activists in the field of oral history to express their views on oral history questions. The names of each participant are listed at the beginning of their answers, and the text of all answers will be published on this portal by the end of the week.
Validation: Challenges and Necessities
Where does truth stand in oral history? How can the correctness of a narrative be recognized? Does fact-checking matter? If there is exaggeration in the reporting of some accounts, how can it be detected? Is it possible to record an event accurately through the recording of a narrative? Readers and users of oral history works are often faced with these questions, and sometimes encounter doubts about some oral history works.From Revolutionary Circles to the Military Arm of the Islamic Government
In those days, it became clear that certain institutions had to be established very quickly—institutions suited to the temperament, expectations, and lingering aspirations of the younger generation; young people who had been politically active before the Revolution and, in some cases, had been directly entangled in arrests, imprisonment, ...Authenticating Oral History: From Possibility to Necessity
The use of oral history as one of the historical sources has long been one of the principal challenges facing oral historians and those who employ it in contemporary historiography. The development of international standards for oral history, as well as IRIB standards, was intended to address the criticisms raised in this regard. The relationship between Diplomatics in written records and oral history is reciprocal.
