Oral History Interview & Importance – Part 23
Arguments with the Narrator
Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian
2017-9-26
One thing that the interviewer shall seriously avoid is long discussions and argument with the narrator. In some cases the narrator insists on the credibility of their information and perceptions and the interviewer has a different idea based on their sources of information. In such cases, both sides might insist on their position and interrupt the interview.
The following has to be stated:
- The main task of the interviewer is to jog the mind of the narrator to help them remember old memories and incidents they have witnessed; however such efforts shall not be imperious and controlling. Unfortunately we see interviewers that due to their knowledge and long experience have a top to bottom look and in case of any mistakes by the narrator brag about their information and humiliate the narrator to prove their perceptions.
- Mistakes in recounting the memories is an inevitable element in the oral history interviewer and requires patience. Nevertheless, time and number of incidents weaken the memory and information gets mixed up and result in faults by the narrator while recounting them and they might not acknowledge their mistake. Under such circumstances, the interviewer shall respectfully and with no long arguments point out the mistake and in case the narrator refuses to accept, the interviewer shall stop the argument and wait for an opportunity to provide enough evidence to prove his argument. In case it doesn’t work, a full description shall be provided as footnote by the narrator while publishing the article.
I remember that while interviewing a prominent social and cultural feature, he made a mistake. I pointed it out to be corrected but he didn’t accept it. Hence, I didn’t argue and in our next sessions tried to provide evidence and literature to prove it. Despite all the evidence he insisted on his position. In such cases there is nothing but patience and flexibility and definitions and elaborations shall be offered as annexes to the publications.
- Sometimes the narrator requires the interviewer to express their opinion on the subject matter or their idea of the memories recounted. Such cases are not an opportunity for arguments and challenges. Our opinion might differ but there is no need to start a long discussion and argument.
- The biggest mistake is to boast others’ opinion and create fronts in between. Such behaviors cripple the narrator’s self-confidence and in some cases it might be associated with a bad reaction by the narrator. Of course in a targeted interview, while asking questions, it is possible to make reference to other narrations but it shall not be in the form of arguments and quarrel.
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 1 - Oral History, Path to Cultural Dialogue
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 2 - Characteristics of an Interviewer
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 3 - Selecting a Subject
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 4 - Narrator Identification & Selection
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 5 - Goal Setting
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 6 - Importance of Pre-interview Data Collection
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 7 - To Schedule & Coordinate an Interview
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 8 - Required Equipment & Accessories
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 9 - Presentation is vital
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 10 - Interview Room
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 11 - Pre-interview Justifications
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 12 - How to Start an Interview
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 13 - Proper Query
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 14 - Sample Query
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 15 - How to ask questions?
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 16 - Body Languag
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 17 - Application of Body Language (1)
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 18 - Application of Body Language (2)
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 19 - Listening Carefully (1)
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 20 - Listening Carefully (2)
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 21- New Questions
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 22 - Duration
Number of Visits: 4517
The latest
Most visited
Hajj Pilgrimage
I went on a Hajj pilgrimage in the early 1340s (1960s). At that time, few people from the army, gendarmerie and police went on a pilgrimage to the holy Mashhad and holy shrines in Iraq. It happened very rarely. After all, there were faithful people in the Iranian army who were committed to obeying the Islamic halal and haram rules in any situation, and they used to pray.A section of the memories of a freed Iranian prisoner; Mohsen Bakhshi
Programs of New Year HolidaysWithout blooming, without flowers, without greenery and without a table for Haft-sin , another spring has been arrived. Spring came to the camp without bringing freshness and the first days of New Year began in this camp. We were unaware of the plans that old friends had in this camp when Eid (New Year) came.
Attack on Halabcheh narrated
With wet saliva, we are having the lunch which that loving Isfahani man gave us from the back of his van when he said goodbye in the city entrance. Adaspolo [lentils with rice] with yoghurt! We were just started having it when the plane dives, we go down and shelter behind the runnel, and a few moments later, when the plane raises up, we also raise our heads, and while eating, we see the high sides ...The Arab People Committee
Another event that happened in Khuzestan Province and I followed up was the Arab People Committee. One day, we were informed that the Arabs had set up a committee special for themselves. At that time, I had less information about the Arab People , but knew well that dividing the people into Arab and non-Arab was a harmful measure.
