Oral History Interview & Importance Part 4
Narrator Identification & Selection
Hamid Qazvini
Translated by Natalie Haghverdian
2017-5-7
As discussed before, oral history is a participatory process in history development so that different information concerning political, cultural and social events are recorded and published in a targeted interview. It is important since the perspectives and narrations of a number of people are gathered in recording historical events.
Under such circumstances, to avoid repetitive interviews and in order to receive new information, it is essential for the oral history scholar to identify and select the narrator with care and wisely based on the intended subject. It is possible to realize this very task by seeking advice from others. It means that informed people introduce narrators and support the scholar in accessing new narrators.
Obviously, the scholar has to adhere to the following:
1- The oral history scholar shall be well versed and dominant on the subject of study and identify and select narrators based on clear understanding and recognition of the diverse aspects of one single subject.
2- Selected narrator shall have sufficient information and direct observation on the issue and avoid interviewing individuals that base their arguments on rumors and personal analysis. Unfortunately, in some cases, lack of access to credible narrators or in order to finish the oral history project, interviews are conducted with people who have no direct memory of the intended incident and provide unverified information which is no answer to the questions of the scholar but promotes ambiguity.
3 – Interviews shall be, if possible, conducted with people who have a good recollection or are in a condition that reminding a piece of information triggers and revives their memory of the concerned incident. Inadvertently, loss of memory will result in citation of bogus and unverifiable information.
4 – Interview with people known for mendacity, falsification of truth or denial shall be avoided.
5- It is essential for the narrator to have memories and information pertinent to the subject of study. It is due to the fact that interviews in subjects irrelevant to the main cause not only have to contribution in addressing research needs but tarnish the concept in general.
6- Physical, psychological and emotional state of the narrator shall be taken into consideration. Once the narrator lacks required health, insisting on interview will result in irritation and hardship for the narrator and his/her immediate family.
7- The narrator shall not be subject to any legal, political, security and judicial restrictions. Such constraints affect the interview and defect its richness and might even cause problems for the scholar.
8- The narrator shall not be divergent towards the subject. In some cases, despite direct observations and being full of information, some problems coinciding with the intended incident or occurring immediately after might result in divergence and change of attitude which corrupts a realistic and careful interview.
9- To the extent possible, individuals selected shall have a positive attitude towards the interview and responding to the questions and consider it a historical necessity.
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 1 - Oral History, Path to Cultural Dialogue
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 2 - Characteristics of an Interviewer
Oral History Interview & Importance Part 3 - Selecting a Subject
Number of Visits: 6338
The latest
Most visited
- Design and Structure of Interview Questions in Oral History: Principles and Methods
- A Reflection on the Relationship between Individual Memory and Oral History
- Oral history news for March-April 2025
- The Embankment Wounded Shoulders – 5
- Morteza Tavakoli Narrates Student Activities
- Sir Saeed
- First Encounter with the Mojahedin-e Khalq
- The 367th "Night of Memory"
A Review of the Book “Brothers of the Castle of the Forgetful”: Memoirs of Taher Asadollahi
"In the morning, a white-haired, thin captain who looked to be twenty-five or six years old came after counting and having breakfast, walked in front of everyone, holding his waist, and said, "From tomorrow on, when you sit down and get up, you will say, 'Death to Khomeini,' otherwise I will bring disaster upon you, so that you will wish for death."Tabas Fog
Ebham-e Tabas: Ramzgoshayi az ja’beh siah-e tahajom nezami Amrika (Tabas Fog: Decoding the Black Box of the U.S. Military Invasion) is the title of a recently published book by Shadab Asgari. After the Islamic Revolution, on November 4, 1979, students seized the US embassy in Tehran and a number of US diplomats were imprisoned. The US army carried out “Tabas Operation” or “Eagle’s Claw” in Iran on April 24, 1980, ostensibly to free these diplomats, but it failed.An Excerpt from the Memoirs of General Mohammad Jafar Asadi
As Operation Fath-ol-Mobin came to an end, the commanders gathered at the “Montazeran-e Shahadat” Base, thrilled by a huge and, to some extent, astonishing victory achieved in such a short time. They were already bracing themselves for the next battle. It is no exaggeration to say that this operation solidified an unprecedented friendship between the Army and IRGC commanders.A Selection from the Memoirs of Haj Hossein Yekta
The scorching cold breeze of the midnight made its way under my wet clothes and I shivered. The artillery fire did not stop. Ali Donyadideh and Hassan Moghimi were in front. The rest were behind us. So ruthlessly that it was as if we were on our own soil. Before we had even settled in at the three-way intersection of the Faw-Basra-Umm al-Qasr road, an Iraqi jeep appeared in front of us.
